Process

I don't start with tools.
I start with constraints.

My process exists to reduce risk, prevent chaos, and make outcomes predictable.

Why A Process Exists

Most technical failures don't happen because of bad tools. They happen because of:

?

Undefined constraints

Premature execution

Invisible assumptions

No graceful degradation

My process is designed to eliminate these failure modes early.

The Process (End to End)

Constraint Mapping

Before anything is built, I map the boundaries.

System Design (Before Tools)

The most important phase. Architecture on paper first.

Tool Selection (Last, Not First)

Only after architecture is clear do tools enter the picture.

Incremental Build

Systems are built in layers, not all at once.

Failure & Edge Case Design

I assume things will break. So I design for it.

Measurement & Iteration

Once live, I measure what matters.

Optimizes For vs. Deliberately Avoids

Optimizes For

Long-term clarity
Reduced operational burden
Scalability without chaos
Trust between humans and systems

Deliberately Avoids

Tool-first automation
"Quick wins" that create future debt
Black-box workflows
Over-abstracted systems no one understands

Who This Process Is For

Works best if you:

Think in systemsValue clarity over speedCare about long-term behaviorWant fewer problems, not more tools

Not designed for:

One-off tasksGrowth hacksShiny automation demos

What Working Together Feels Like

Fewer meetings

Async-first

Clear documentation

Always current

Predictable progress

No surprises

Systems adapt

Process stays

If something changes, the system adapts not the process.

Ready to start with constraints?

We'll start with constraints.

This process stays the same. Only the systems change.